<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution Theology: Religion 2.0</title>
	<link>http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com/2008/08/13/evolution-theology-religion-20/</link>
	<description>By Michael Dowd</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Religion News, Blogs and More &#187; - christianity religion</title>
		<link>http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com/2008/08/13/evolution-theology-religion-20/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Religion News, Blogs and More &#187; - christianity religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com/2008/08/13/evolution-theology-religion-20/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>[...]  Evolution Theology: Religion 2.0  By michael  As I and others are now using the term, Evolution Theology, or Religion 2.0, refers to those whose position on the science vs. religion controversy tends toward reconciliation or synthesis. The term points broadly to those who do not &#8230;   Evolutionary Christianity - http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  Evolution Theology: Religion 2.0  By michael  As I and others are now using the term, Evolution Theology, or Religion 2.0, refers to those whose position on the science vs. religion controversy tends toward reconciliation or synthesis. The term points broadly to those who do not &#8230;   Evolutionary Christianity - <a href="http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com" rel="nofollow">http://evolutionarychristianity.theooze.com</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
